top of page
Search

Enhancing Shear Wall Capacity for Seismic Events

  • Writer: Gabriel Okafor
    Gabriel Okafor
  • May 18, 2025
  • 3 min read

Updated: Jul 18, 2025

In seismic-prone regions, the integrity of shear walls can mean the difference between a resilient structure and catastrophic failure. At our firm, we don’t just follow building codes; we engineer clarity, coordination, and confidence into the process. One recent project exemplifies how a well-structured approach to inspections helped us elevate both seismic performance and construction efficiency.


Elevating Seismic Performance Through Inspections


The Challenge: Multi-System Coordination in Seismic Builds

The challenge was clear: a complex build incorporating multiple structural systems — steel frames, cast-in-place concrete, and wood diaphragm elements. Each material comes with its own inspection requirements and timing constraints. Missteps in sequencing inspections or failing to identify deficiencies before concealment could have led to costly delays, code violations, or worse—compromised safety.


The Solution: A Matrix-Driven Inspection Workflow

To tackle this, we implemented a comprehensive inspection matrix tailored to CBC 2022 and IBC 1705.


What is an Inspection Matrix?

An inspection matrix is a project-specific tool that aligns structural elements and work sequences with corresponding code-required inspections. It helps prevent oversight by detailing tasks, timing, and required inspector credentials.





Instead of relying on reactive scheduling or fragmented communication, this matrix specified exactly what needed to be inspected, when, and by whom. Whether it was epoxy anchors in concrete shear walls, field welding on structural steel, or diaphragm nailing in wood framing, each inspection was mapped to:


  • A specific task (e.g., epoxy anchoring, diaphragm nailing)

  • Required inspection type (continuous or periodic)

  • Inspector qualifications (e.g., AWS Q.C.-1, Deputy Inspector)


The Importance of Proactive Coordination

Planning alone isn’t enough for execution. Thus, we introduced a shared observation log. This log operated at the intersection of design intent and construction pace. It was updated in advance of site work and was not just a document; it was a proactive coordination tool.


The shared log provided all stakeholders, from subcontractors to special inspectors, a clear view of upcoming inspection touchpoints. This approach helped maintain construction velocity while ensuring full compliance.


Real-Time Solutions in Critical Moments

In one notable phase of the build, the team faced a critical moment: a large concrete shear wall pour was scheduled right after a complex sequence of epoxy doweling and steel plate embed placements. Thanks to our inspection matrix and shared log, we identified a conflict between the timing for the steel embed inspection and the pour window.


With real-time visibility, we flagged and resolved the issue in coordination with the special inspector—avoiding a full-day delay and costly rework.


Final Structural Observation

The final step was the Structural Engineer of Record (SEOR) structural observation, the last checkpoint before sign-off. The early identification and resolution of issues—like misaligned plates, insufficient weld continuity, and incomplete nailing—meant that the structural observation served more as confirmation than as correction. The structure was ready, the documentation was clean, and the sign-off was swift.


This method was not merely about following rules; it was about building a workflow that integrates compliance seamlessly. When enhancing shear wall capacity to withstand seismic events, the margin for error is zero. By combining code alignment, qualified inspection, and seamless communication, we delivered a solution that not only met expectations but set a new internal benchmark for execution.


Detailed shear wall plan showing epoxy anchors, steel embeds, and wood diaphragm layout for seismic reinforcement.
Detailed shear wall plan showing epoxy anchors, steel embeds, and wood diaphragm layout for seismic reinforcement.

Key Takeaways

An inspection matrix aligned with CBC 2022 and IBC 1705 streamlines oversight across steel, concrete, and wood systems.


  • Coordinated scheduling and a shared observation log eliminate bottlenecks and ensure timely inspections before concealment.

  • Early detection of issues like misaligned embeds or insufficient diaphragm nailing can prevent costly rework and project delays.

  • Integrating compliance into the workflow is essential in setting the stage for smooth SEOR sign-off and reliable seismic performance.


The Benefits of a Structured Approach

By adopting a structured approach, we’ve enhanced not only our projects but also our team’s understanding of the critical nature of seismic compliance. All stakeholders benefit, from the engineers developing the plans to the tradespeople executing the work.


Finally, this meticulous attention to detail isn't just a box to check. It establishes a culture of excellence. Ensuring that buildings can withstand seismic forces is not just our job; it’s our responsibility to the communities we serve.


INSPECT PROJECT FILES BELOW.


 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page